Bad News for Trump — Shocking Resignation Rocks His Administration!1
Gen. Christopher Donahue has now left both of the senior European commands he held for roughly 18 months, closing an unusually prominent chapter in the career of one of the U.S. Army’s most experienced combat leaders as the Pentagon restructures its top ranks under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Donahue relinquished command of U.S. Army Europe and Africa on July 2 at Clay Kaserne in Wiesbaden, Germany. One week later, on July 9, he also gave up command of NATO’s Allied Land Command in Izmir, Türkiye.
Those departures are no longer prospective. By late August, both commands are behind him, while the exact effective date of his retirement from active Army service has not been publicly announced in the same way.
The Army’s General Officer Management Office currently lists Donahue in a transition status and records his U.S. Army Europe and Africa and Allied Land Command assignment as ending in July 2026.
That distinction matters because some early reporting described Donahue simply as preparing to retire. What is certain is that he has relinquished the operational commands. What remains less clear publicly is when his formal retirement from active duty will take effect and in what grade he will ultimately retire.
The change also has become more consequential than it initially appeared because the Pentagon has since confirmed that Donahue’s former U.S. Army Europe and Africa post is being reduced from a four-star billet to a three-star billet.
On July 24, the Pentagon announced the nomination of Lt. Gen. Kevin D. Admiral, commander of III Armored Corps and Fort Hood, to become the next permanent commander of U.S. Army Europe and Africa.
If confirmed by the Senate, Admiral would also command NATO’s Allied Land Command. Defense reporting said he would remain a lieutenant general rather than receive a fourth star, confirming that the position Donahue held as a general is being downgraded to three-star leadership.
Admiral’s nomination was still pending in late August. His current Army biography continued to list him as commander of III Armored Corps and Fort Hood, while Maj. Gen. Christopher R. Norrie remained the acting commander of U.S. Army Europe and Africa.
The NATO side of the transition has followed a separate interim arrangement. Reporting citing a Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe spokesperson said British Army Lt. Gen. Jez Bennett, LANDCOM’s deputy commander, would serve as acting commander after Donahue’s July 9 departure until another American officer takes over the post.
The United States is expected to retain leadership of Allied Land Command under NATO’s revised command arrangements. NATO announced in February that European allies would assume greater responsibility in several other senior commands while the United States would continue to lead the alliance’s land and air component commands and add responsibility for the maritime component.
That makes Donahue’s departure part of two overlapping changes: an American effort to cut the number of senior general officers and a broader NATO effort to redistribute leadership while European allies assume a larger share of conventional defense responsibilities.
The Army’s formal statement on Donahue’s departure was notably restrained.
It thanked him for his leadership and highlighted his work integrating U.S. and NATO land forces, but it did not provide a detailed explanation for why his tenure ended after only about 18 months in a position that normally lasts longer.
Multiple news organizations have supplied the missing political context through sourced reporting.
Fox News reported that Donahue submitted retirement paperwork at Hegseth’s request. The Washington Post reported that Hegseth blocked internal efforts within the Army and on Capitol Hill to extend Donahue’s career, leading the general to submit retirement papers. CBS News reported that Donahue had drawn Hegseth’s displeasure and that the two men had met in person only once, in February 2025.
Those reports are significant, but they should be distinguished from an official Defense Department explanation. The Pentagon has not publicly released a personnel memorandum laying out a specific cause for Donahue’s departure.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell, when pressed about the decision, has emphasized that general and flag officers serve at the pleasure of the president and defense secretary rather than offering a detailed public rationale.
The broader policy behind the leadership changes is much clearer.
In May 2025, Hegseth directed the Pentagon to reduce the number of four-star general and flag officer positions in the active force by at least 20 percent, cut National Guard general officers by at least 20 percent and reduce the overall number of general and flag officers by at least 10 percent in connection with changes to the unified command structure.
Hegseth described the approach as an effort to eliminate unnecessary layers of senior leadership and redirect emphasis toward operational forces, using the phrase “less generals, more GIs.”
Supporters of the restructuring argue that a smaller senior command structure can reduce bureaucracy, clarify responsibility and move personnel and resources closer to operational units.
Critics have questioned whether rapid cuts and early departures could remove experienced leaders faster than the services can replace their expertise, particularly during simultaneous security challenges in Europe, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific.
Donahue’s case has drawn unusual attention because his record fits the profile Hegseth has publicly said the military should value: extensive combat experience, special operations service, large-unit command and a focus on adapting the Army to new forms of warfare.
Donahue graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in 1992 and spent much of his career in airborne, Ranger and special operations assignments.
His official NATO biography says he deployed 20 times in support of operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, North Africa and Eastern Europe. His assignments included senior roles in Joint Special Operations Command, command in U.S. Army Special Operations Command, leadership of the Army Infantry School and command of the 82nd Airborne Division and XVIII Airborne Corps.
His most recognizable public moment came in Afghanistan in August 2021.
As commander of the 82nd Airborne Division, Donahue deployed to Kabul as American forces secured Hamid Karzai International Airport during the emergency evacuation that followed the collapse of the Afghan government and the Taliban’s return to power.
On Aug. 30, 2021, a night-vision photograph showed Donahue walking toward the final U.S. C-17 aircraft leaving Kabul. The image became one of the defining photographs of the end of America’s nearly 20-year military presence in Afghanistan.
The evacuation moved more than 120,000 people out of Afghanistan in a matter of weeks, but it also became one of the most controversial episodes of the Biden presidency because of the chaotic conditions surrounding the airport, the rapid Taliban takeover and the Aug. 26 ISIS-K suicide bombing at Abbey Gate.
That attack killed 13 U.S. service members and scores of Afghan civilians.
Care is required when describing Donahue’s responsibility for Abbey Gate. The official military investigation showed that Marines from 2nd Battalion, 1st Marines operated Abbey Gate during the evacuation, while Donahue and the 82nd Airborne Division held broader responsibilities for airport security, coordination and the final withdrawal.
The investigative record also shows that Donahue served as a principal coordinator with the Taliban liaison and that the 82nd Airborne conducted security and evacuation operations at other gates and across the airfield.
That makes it inaccurate to assign Donahue direct tactical control over every decision at Abbey Gate, just as it would be inaccurate to separate him entirely from the larger evacuation operation he helped lead.
Afghanistan remains politically relevant to his departure because the Trump administration has made accountability for the 2021 withdrawal a major Pentagon priority.
But the timeline in some accounts has been wrong. Hegseth did not launch the current review in May 2026. He formally ordered the comprehensive Defense Department review on May 20, 2025.
Hegseth directed Sean Parnell to convene a Special Review Panel to reexamine previous investigations, interview witnesses, review decision-making and determine whether additional accountability was warranted.
By April 16, 2026, the panel said it had completed the substantive phase of interviews with senior military and civilian officials and had reviewed more than nine million documents.
The panel publicly identified Donahue as one of the senior officers it interviewed, along with former Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, former Central Command chief Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, former U.S. commander in Afghanistan Gen. Austin Miller and other leaders involved in the withdrawal.
The fact that Donahue was interviewed establishes that the review examined his role. It does not establish that the panel found misconduct by him or that Hegseth removed him because of Afghanistan.
As of late August, no public report from the review has established such a causal connection.
That distinction is especially important because the Pentagon’s earlier investigations into the Abbey Gate attack reached detailed findings about force protection, gate operations and the suicide bomber. Any new claim that Donahue was forced out as punishment for the withdrawal would require evidence connecting the personnel decision to those findings.
For now, the publicly supported explanation is broader: Donahue’s early exit occurred during Hegseth’s campaign to reduce senior ranks and restructure command billets, while separate reporting says Hegseth personally opposed extending Donahue’s career.
Donahue’s post-Afghanistan career also complicates any simple theory that the 2021 withdrawal ended his rise.
After Kabul, he took command of XVIII Airborne Corps in March 2022 and became deeply involved in the Army’s response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
His corps became central to the rapid reinforcement of NATO’s eastern flank, the movement of American forces into Europe and the Army’s effort to absorb battlefield lessons from Ukraine.
The Senate confirmed Donahue’s promotion to four-star general in December 2024, and he assumed command of U.S. Army Europe and Africa and NATO Allied Land Command that month.
The promotion itself had briefly become entangled in the politics of Afghanistan. Sen. Markwayne Mullin temporarily held the nomination before the Senate confirmed Donahue on Dec. 2, 2024. The Army lists his date of rank as Dec. 10, 2024.
In Europe, Donahue became one of the Army’s most visible advocates for adapting large formations to a battlefield dominated by drones, electronic warfare, long-range fires, rapid targeting and digital command networks.
The Army credited him with helping develop and scale the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative, a concept designed to integrate U.S. and allied land forces with NATO’s regional defense plans.
The initiative is built around a shared digital operating picture and faster integration of manned and unmanned systems, with the goal of allowing allied formations to detect threats, share data and act more quickly across national boundaries.
At Donahue’s July 2 relinquishment ceremony, Supreme Allied Commander Europe Gen. Alexus Grynkewich praised his ability to identify the need for change, create a plan and build processes intended to survive beyond his tenure.
Donahue, in his own remarks, focused on the organization rather than the circumstances of his exit.
“I love this team—it has been the honor of a lifetime to be a part of it,” he said, adding that he was proud of what the command had built and confident in what its soldiers, civilians and allies would do next.
The permanent succession plan is now clearer than it was when Donahue left.
Norrie is serving as the acting Army commander while Admiral’s nomination moves through the Senate. If Admiral is confirmed, he would become the first permanent leader of the command under the newly reduced three-star structure and would also take the American-led NATO LANDCOM position.
That confirmed downgrade corrects an important point in earlier reporting. In May and June, officials were discussing whether U.S. Army Europe and Africa would become a three-star headquarters. At that stage, Pentagon spokesmen said no final decision had been announced.
The July nomination settled the question. The Pentagon selected a three-star officer for the permanent job and did not nominate him for promotion to general.
The change does not mean U.S. Army Europe and Africa is disappearing or that its missions have been eliminated. The command remains responsible for Army operations, exercises, theater security cooperation and deterrence across Europe and Africa, an area encompassing more than 100 countries.
It does, however, show how Hegseth’s senior-rank reduction is moving from general policy into specific command structures.
Donahue’s retirement grade presents a separate issue that is more technical than descriptions of “four-star benefits” suggest.
Federal law generally requires a commissioned officer voluntarily retiring above the rank of captain to have served at least three years in the grade in which the officer seeks to retire.
The secretary of defense may reduce that service-in-grade requirement to no less than two years, while the president may waive the requirement in an individual case involving extreme hardship or exceptional or unusual circumstances.
For officers who have served as lieutenant generals or generals, the defense secretary must also certify in writing to the president and the congressional armed services committees that the officer served satisfactorily in that grade before the officer may retire in it.
If an officer does not satisfy the applicable time-in-grade requirement and no authorized reduction or waiver applies, the statute generally provides for retirement in the next lower grade in which the officer served satisfactorily.
Donahue’s Army record lists his date of rank as a four-star general as Dec. 10, 2024.
That means he has not yet served two full years as a general as of Aug. 25, 2026. If his active-duty retirement becomes effective before he reaches the two-year mark and he seeks to retire as a four-star general, a presidential waiver would be necessary under the ordinary statutory framework.
If his retirement date is delayed until he has completed at least two years in grade, the secretary of defense could potentially use the separate authority to reduce the normal three-year requirement to two years, subject to the statute’s conditions and required congressional notice.
The public record does not yet show which path, if any, will be used in Donahue’s case.
That is why it is more accurate to describe the issue as eligibility to retire in the four-star grade, rather than saying simply that he needs a waiver to receive full four-star benefits.
The retired grade affects status and retired pay calculations, but the governing process turns on service in grade, satisfactory-service certification and any reduction or waiver authorized by law.
The absence of a publicly announced final retirement date makes that issue impossible to resolve conclusively today.
Several facts, however, are now established beyond the uncertainty that surrounded the initial reports in June.
Donahue relinquished U.S. Army Europe and Africa on July 2. He relinquished Allied Land Command on July 9. Norrie took over the Army command on an acting basis, while Bennett assumed the NATO land command temporarily. The Pentagon has nominated Admiral as the permanent successor, with the position reduced to three-star rank.
Donahue’s departure also occurred within Hegseth’s explicit campaign to cut general and flag officer billets, and multiple news organizations reported that the defense secretary played a direct role in ending or declining to extend Donahue’s career.
What remains unproven is equally important.
The Pentagon has not publicly established that Donahue committed misconduct in Afghanistan, that the Special Review Panel recommended his removal, or that the 2021 withdrawal was the specific reason Hegseth wanted him to leave.
The precise date on which Donahue will formally retire from active service also remains unclear in the public record, as does the final statutory action governing his retired grade.
Those unresolved questions will continue to make the case politically sensitive because Donahue was not an obscure headquarters officer approaching an expected retirement.
He was a four-star commander with extensive special operations and conventional combat experience, a central figure in the Afghanistan evacuation, a leader in the Army’s response to the Ukraine war and an officer widely discussed as a potential candidate for even higher military leadership.
His exit therefore provides one of the clearest examples yet of how quickly the Trump administration and Hegseth are remaking the Pentagon’s senior command structure.
The most defensible conclusion is not that Donahue was punished for Afghanistan, nor that his departure was merely a routine retirement.
May you like
It is that an unusually experienced four-star general left two major U.S. and NATO commands early, amid a defense secretary’s deliberate reduction of senior ranks, after Hegseth reportedly rejected efforts to keep him in uniform — and the Pentagon has now permanently reshaped his former Army billet around a three-star successor.
