"🔥 MASSIVE BACKLASH! — DONALD TRUMP FACES A RECORD 26 ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT!"
President Donald Trump has been slapped with 26 new articles of by a House accusing him of abuses of power, violations of his oath of office, and a sweeping range of other alleged misconduct.
Representative a Tennessee Democrat and senior member of the House Judiciary Committee, introduced the articles on September 24, just nine days after the House rejected a separate impeachment effort brought by Democratic Representative of Texas.
The latest effort comes as Democrats remain divided over pursuing impeachment against Trump.
Green's resolution was shelved by the House in a 232-147 vote on September 15, with 18 Democrats joining nearly all Republicans in voting to table it and another 47 lawmakers voting present. Those voting present included House Democratic leaders Hakeem Jeffries, Katherine Clark and Pete Aguilar.
What Are the 26 Articles of Impeachment Against Trump?
Cohen's resolution is considerably wider than Green's. Its 26 articles encompass allegations involving Trump's immigration policies, the use of military power, federal spending, tariffs, presidential pardons, the federal workforce, universities, law firms, the media, and alleged personal financial benefit from the presidency.
What Are the 26 Articles of Impeachment Against Trump?
Article I: Undermining Democracy—Sowing Doubt in Elections
Article II: Abuse of Power—Waging War on Iran Without Congressional Approval
Article III: Abuse of Power—Extrajudicial Killings in International Waters of Venezuela
Article IV: Abuse of Power—Deploying Military Forces Against United States Cities
Article V: Violation of Oath—The Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
Article VI: Abuse of Power—Canceling Federal Grants to Punish States for Their Votes
Article VII: Abuse of Power—Imposing Loyalty Tests on the Federal Workforce
Article VIII: Disregard of Courts—The Alien Enemies Act and the Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Article IX: Violation of Oath—Cruel and Unusual Punishment at CECOT
Article X: Violation of Oath—Unlawful Withholding of Appropriated Funds and Dismantling of Congressionally Established Programs
Article XI: Abuse of Power—Obstructing the Lawful Appointment of United States Attorneys
Article XII: Abuse of Power—Defying Court Orders in Immigration Enforcement
Article XIII: Abolishing a Congressionally Mandated Agency—The Department of Education
Article XIV: Violation of Oath—Unlawful Mass Termination of Inspectors General Without Statutory Notice to Congress
Article XV: Unlawfully and Unilaterally Taxing United States Citizens Through Emergency Powers Tariffs
Article XVI: Abuse of Power—Political Prosecutions of Comey, James, and Schiff
Article XVII: Abuse of Power—The IRS Settlement and the Corruption of the Judgment Fund
Article XVIII: Abuse of Power—The Corrupt Use of the Pardon Power
Article XIX: Attacks on a Free Press—Banishing Reporters From the White House for Disfavored Coverage
Article XX: Attacks on a Free Press—Coercing CBS and ABC to Change Editorial Content
Article XXI: Violation of Oath—Free Speech and Retaliatory Executive Orders Against Law Firms
Article XXII: Violation of Oath—Free Speech and Coercing Universities Through Withheld Federal Funds
Article XXIII: Abuse of Power—Demolishing the White House East Wing Without Congressional Approval
Article XXIV: Violation of Oath—The Illegal Impoundment of Appropriated Funds
Article XXV: Abuse of Power—Self-Aggrandizement Through the Renaming of Public Institutions, Seizure of Cultural and Civic Property, and Personal Appropriation of National Currency
Article XXVI: Emoluments Violations—Profiting Personally and Directly From the Presidency
"🚨 BRANSON'S SCATHING ATTACK! — HE BLASTS TRUMP OVER PUTIN TIES AND URGES EUROPE TO STAND FIRM!"
British billionaire Sir Richard Branson has launched a fierce public attack on Donald Trump, accusing the U.S. administration of appeasing dictators and putting personal preferences ahead of American and allied interests.
The Virgin Group founder made his criticism in a LinkedIn post published this week, questioning why Trump appeared so willing to accommodate Russian President Vladimir Putin while Ukraine continues to face Russia’s invasion.
Branson described the administration as an “appeaser to autocrats and dictators,” arguing that its approach could weaken confidence among America’s traditional allies and undermine the interests of democratic nations.
He also raised a pointed question about the president’s relationship with Putin, asking why Trump seemed to flatter the Russian leader despite the continuing war and widespread international concern over Moscow’s actions.
The remarks come amid renewed controversy over a reported agreement involving Russian diesel supplies and a temporary easing of U.S. sanctions on Russian energy exports.
Trump has defended the arrangement as beneficial to fuel markets, while critics argue that allowing Russian energy revenues to flow could indirectly help Moscow sustain its war effort.
Branson called the deal deeply hypocritical, pointing to the contrast between Washington’s previous willingness to penalize countries purchasing Russian energy and its own decision to ease restrictions.
His criticism extended beyond energy policy. He also condemned Trump’s public attacks on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, describing the administration’s treatment of Ukraine as a betrayal during a period of war and suffering.
The billionaire’s intervention follows mounting concern in Kyiv and across Europe about the durability of American support for Ukraine, particularly as diplomatic efforts have struggled to produce a lasting settlement.
Branson also expressed alarm about reports involving restrictions on Starshield services used by Ukraine, a technology issue that has raised questions about the country’s access to crucial battlefield communications.
Some of Branson’s claims about the consequences of satellite-service restrictions have not been independently confirmed, and the details of decisions involving military communications remain disputed.
He urged European leaders to respond more decisively, arguing that the continent cannot simply wait for Washington to determine the future of Ukraine’s security and its broader relationship with Russia.
His proposed response reportedly included considering the use of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine and supplying more advanced weapons, measures that would intensify the confrontation with Moscow.
The comments place Branson among a relatively small group of prominent business leaders willing to criticize Trump directly over foreign policy, despite the political and commercial sensitivities surrounding such interventions.
Branson has previously spoken out in support of Ukraine and criticized approaches that he believes would pressure Kyiv into accepting an unfavorable peace agreement with Russia.
The latest dispute also comes at a politically sensitive moment in the United States, with congressional midterm elections approaching and foreign policy increasingly intertwined with domestic debates over leadership and national priorities.
Supporters of Trump’s approach may argue that direct engagement with Moscow and energy-market flexibility can serve American interests, even when such policies provoke disagreement among allies.
Critics counter that concessions to Russia risk weakening deterrence and sending an unsettling message to countries relying on the United States for diplomatic, economic and military support.
The disagreement reflects a broader debate over whether negotiations and economic pragmatism can help end the war—or whether they could give Moscow additional leverage without securing meaningful concessions.
For Ukraine, the stakes remain immediate: continued military pressure, uncertainty over international support and the search for a settlement that preserves its sovereignty remain central concerns.
Branson’s intervention adds another prominent voice to the dispute, challenging the White House’s handling of Russia and demanding a stronger response from Europe as the conflict continues.
